TITLE:
|
HEALING THE COLONIAL WOUNDS: AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL MIGRATION IN THE WORK OF LEE MARACLE |
|||
Author: |
Carmen Arzua Azurmendi |
|||
Institution: |
Universidad Complutense de Madrid |
|||
E-mail: |
||||
ABSTRACT |
In “Critical Mirrors: Theories of Autobiography,” Charles Berryman suggests that scholarly interest (and disinterest) in autobiography has tended to reflect academic trends. He points out that autobiography was not considered a suitable object of study for historians and literary critics until extreme skepticism came to dominate the academy (74). Ironically, it was the skeptical destabilization of selfhood that made the self’s story of itself worthy of scholarly attention. This flowering of interest in the genre as a whole may in part explain the current fascination with Native autobiography; however, autobiography has long been standard fare among critics of indigenous literatures. Non-native study of Native autobiography has a lengthy history, beginning with the attempts of anthropologists (most notably, followers of Franz Boas) to record traces of a perceived/vanishing people by preserving and recording their self/stories. I will start by examining some dominant trends and voices in the criticism of Aboriginal autobiographies in the continuing process of working toward an indigenous/centered critical approach, and finish with a demonstration of such a criticism by conducting a brief analysis of Lee Maracle’s autobiography Bobbi Lee Indian Rebel (1990), written in the 1970s, and the novel Daughters Are Forever (2002) by the same writer which reflects an evolution of style and theme in Aboriginal women’s life stories.
|
|||
PANEL | POSTCOLONIAL STUDIES | |||